In Canada, the sale, importation, and use of hazardous chemical products are strictly governed by the Hazardous Products Regulations (HPR), the Hazardous Products Act (HPA), and provincial regulations such as the Hazardous Products Information Regulation (HPIR) under the Act respecting occupational health and safety (OSHA) in Quebec.
Because the transition period granted to integrate the GHS regulatory amendments (7th and 8th revised editions) ended in December 2025, all Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) and labels must imperatively comply with the regulations currently in force.
Here is a detailed analysis from our experts addressing the most frequent technical questions.
Short answer: No, not for a product intended for resale or distribution.
According to the Hazardous Products Regulations (HPR), Section 1 of an SDS distributed in Canada must display an "initial supplier identifier" residing in Canada (name, full mailing address, and phone number).
| COMPLIANCE MATRIX: SUPPLIER IN SECTION 1 | ||
| COMPANY SITUATION | HPR REQUIREMENTS | |
| Sale, resale, or distribution in Canada | --> | Canadian importer address |
| Direct import for internal use (Sec. 5.9) | --> | Foreign supplier address |
1. Products Sold or Distributed in Canada (General Rule)
2. Direct Importation for Exclusive Internal Use (Exemption under HPR Sec. 5.9)
Short answer: No. An SDS designed under the European REACH/CLP regulations does not comply with Canadian law.
Although the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) provides a common international framework, major legislative differences remain:
What Kalium Solutions does for you: Our experts and chemists adapt and rewrite your foreign-sourced SDSs through our turnkey SDS authoring service to convert them into compliant documents meeting Health Canada and CNESST requirements. If you prefer to manage conversions internally, you can rely on our SDS authoring and management software to rapidly generate compliant, bilingual Canadian sheets adhering to current regulations, including the latest updates.
In Canada, occupational exposure limits fall primarily under provincial and territorial jurisdiction. When authoring a Canadian SDS, selecting Section 8 data follows a strict legal priority cascade:

Priority 1: Destination Province Regulations
List the limits established by applicable provincial legislation first:
Priority 2: ACGIH Standards (Regulatory Incorporation by Reference)
If a province has not set a value for a specific substance, the majority of provincial jurisdictions incorporate the recommendations of the ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists) by reference. The current TLV-TWA (Threshold Limit Value - Time-Weighted Average) and TLV-STEL (Threshold Limit Value - Short-Term Exposure Limit) values then become the legal requirement.
Special Case: Federally Regulated Businesses (COHSR)
For organizations under federal jurisdiction (interprovincial transport, airports, telecommunications, banks), section 10.19(1) of the Canada Occupational Health and Safety Regulations (COHSR) mandates compliance exclusively with the most recent TLV values published by the ACGIH.
Priority 3 & 4: Absence of Legal Limits: Scientific References and ALARA Principle
When no value is specified by law or the ACGIH, the employer must exercise due diligence and limit exposure to the lowest reasonably achievable level under the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle. Scientific and recognized technical recommendations should then be referenced:
| Compliance Criterion | Supplier Label | Workplace Label |
|---|---|---|
| Legally Responsible Party | Manufacturer, importer, or distributor | Employer |
| Trigger Event | Prior to the product entering the facility | Decanting, illegible original label, internal production |
| Language | Mandatory bilingual (French/English) | Official workplace language(s) (e.g., Quebec requires French) |
| Number of Elements | 6 regulatory elements (HPR Sec. 3(1)) | 3 mandatory elements (HPIR Sec. 7) |
Label Elements:
Under hazardous products regulations (HPIR in Quebec), a workplace label is legally required in 3 situations:
Immediate Use Exemption (HPIR Sec. 13):
A workplace label is not mandatory during decanting if and only if:
If the container is left unattended (even during a break) or if product remains for the next shift, labeling becomes immediately mandatory.
Yes. It is fully compliant to reproduce (via color printing or photocopying) the original supplier label to affix to a secondary container. Although it exceeds the 3-element minimum required for workplace labels, it offers maximum safety, provided the print remains exact to the original and fully legible.
An unlabeled container creates immediate ambiguity in the workplace. Clearly identifying non-regulated substances (demineralized water, food-grade oil) eliminates doubt, prevents handling errors, and avoids non-compliance notices during health and safety inspections (such as by the CNESST).
Since the implementation of WHMIS 2015 and its 2022 update, the automatic 3-year expiration rule no longer exists for the majority of provincially regulated businesses.

1. General Provincial Rule (Continuous Update - HPA Sec. 14.3):
The SDS remains valid as long as no significant new data is issued. Suppliers have 90 days to update the SDS (and 180 days for the label) following a change in formulation, the emergence of new toxicological data, or a regulatory revision (HPR Sec. 5.12).
2. Exception for the Federal Sector (COHSR Sec. 10.32):
Businesses under federal jurisdiction must imperatively renew their SDSs from their suppliers at least every 3 years.
3. 2026 Enforcement Status (WHMIS 2015 Revision 2022):
With the transition period ending in December 2025, any SDS based exclusively on pre-December 2022 criteria is considered outdated and non-compliant. Your SDSs must include new hazard categories (aerosols, flammable gases, combustible dusts).
To learn about all changes, read our blog post: Important Update on WHMIS.
No. The legal responsibility for training is non-transferable.
Under Section 32 of the HPIR and Section 62 of the OSHA in Quebec (and equivalent directives in other provinces), a new employer cannot simply file a certificate issued by a former employer or external organization.
Part 1: Theoretical Training (General):
If the employee holds a certificate, the new employer has a legal duty to verify and validate their knowledge (via a questionnaire or internal evaluation). In case of failure or uncertainty, the theoretical training must be retaken.
Part 2: Practical Training (Workplace-Specific):
Strictly mandatory with every new hire. The new employer must train the worker on:
Do you have doubts about the compliance of your Safety Data Sheets (SDSs), labels, or the structure of your WHMIS training program?
Our regulatory experts and chemists can perform a complete audit of your inventory and author customized documents tailored to your needs.